Saturday, January 5, 2013

On Being a Professional Educator


            I believe that teaching is a worthy occupation, and those who commit themselves to the job of educating the nation’s youth, should be held in the highest regard as the professionals they are.  Unfortunately, however, many do not think that teaching is a profession in the same way that lawyers, doctors, architects and accountants are.

            There are several reasons why some do not regard teachers as professionals. One is the fact that teaching has traditionally been a female dominated profession, as a result, it is viewed with the latent sexism that still permeates our culture.  Going back to its earliest inception, public education was one of the few vocations for young women outside of the home, however it was widely assumed that when a teacher married, she would leave the classroom and focus her attention on her home and family. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, approximately 76% of teachers today are women, this is particularly true in the elementary grades. As a result, teachers still wear the pink collar and endure the latent sexism associated with it, in the form of low pay, low expectations, low status and a paternalistic hierarchy in which those at the top know what’s best for those below.

            Another reason why teachers are not considered professionals is due to the fact that there are so many of us. There are approximately 3.7 million teachers employed across this nation. In order to have a licensed teacher in every classroom the process by which one becomes a teacher has been lowered to such an extent as to meet the critical demand. Stanford University historian David Labaree calls this the “devils bargain” between quantity and quality: producing enough teachers to meet demand, or preparing fewer teachers to high standards. Under pressure, he says, they chose quantity.[i] Think of it this way, if getting into a teacher preparation program were as difficult as getting into law school, how in the world would we have enough teachers to go around?  This means that colleges of education essentially admit and graduate students who academically would not be our first choice for educating our children, this is especially true at the elementary level, According to recent research “While aspiring secondary school teachers do well compared to the national average on SAT and GRE exams, the scores of future elementary school teachers fall near the bottom of test takers. Their GRE scores are 100 points below the national average.”[ii] I addition to the devil’s bargain already mentioned schools of education enroll more students than other university departments because education students are a primary source of revenue for the school, “Universities use their teacher education programs as “cash cows,” requiring them to generate revenue to fund more prestigious departments. This forces them to increase their enrollments and lower their admissions standards. Schools with low admissions standards also tend to
have low graduation requirements.”[iii] 

            To be clear, there are a number of education schools that produce top notch teachers in this country, but those school are generally more expensive to attend, and because the teacher’s earning potential doesn’t warrant the investment, most classrooms are staffed by teachers at the low to middle level of the talent pool. I should also point out that there are a number of highly intelligent and motivated people who have received degrees in education who are incredible teachers, but generally speaking, American schools are going to have to figure out a way to attract the best and the brightest into the profession and keep them for the long haul. Those of intellectual means and ambition are not going to settle for the working conditions and dead end prospects of today’s classroom, there are easier, less stressful ways to make earn a living.

            Additionally teachers are not considered professionals because of the fact that most of us have accumulated over thirteen thousand hours of class time as students. We have engaged, whether we know it or not, in “apprenticeship by observation” this is the idea that we can all teach because we have watched our teachers. Most people would agree that watching medical dramas on T.V. is not enough training to preform open heart surgery, the same way that court T.V. dramas are not adequate substitutions for a law degree. Teaching on-the-other-hand seems like something anyone can do.  As long as you have a rudimentary grasp of the subject, how hard can it be? It is this attitude based upon ignorance that prevents many from seeing teaching as a profession. Finally, many do not look upon teaching as a true profession because of the hours we work. After all you don’t see other professionals who are done with their workday by the early afternoon or enjoy constant holiday and observational breaks and of course the coups de grace, summers off. Of course try to explain this to a dedicated teacher and they will look at you like you are crazy, due to the fact that those teachers work constantly, paid and unpaid, contracted hours or not, good teachers put in as many more hours than most lawyers and doctors.

            Whether or not the public see us as the professionals we are it is important that we conduct ourselves as professionals, we may not be able to change the public’s perception of teachers overnight, but we are able to influence the small circle of students, colleagues, administrators, parents, and stake holders that we interact with on a daily basis.

No comments:

Post a Comment